On 9/26/17 5:15 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 26 September 2017 at 10:03, Guus der Kinderen > <guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Should we rename the status names that we use in XEPs? One of the recurring >> criticisms about XMPP that I read is "Pretty-standard-feature XYZ has a XEP >> that is only "experimental"! By doing some window dressing, we will improve >> the perceived maturity and stability of the protocol. > > Left shifts are bad. > > I'd rather we chose to aggressively advance XEPs, and where we find > that impossible, try to fix the problems preventing it. In other > words, I would rather improve the actual maturity and stability of the > protocol, rather than merely play with the perception of it. > > We need a playground, and we need that playground to be in the open - > Experimental XEPs should be providing this playground. > > That said, "Draft" is an IETF-ism that could easily enough be replaced > by "Stable" - it's been dropped at the IETF (incorrectly, I feel, but > still) so the reference is largely gone. > > Dave.
I'd be fine with "Stable". Peter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
