Wed, 27 Sep 2017 08:51:48 +0100 Dave Cridland <d...@cridland.net> wrote:
> * We have one S2S implementation, supporting SNI. > > On that basis, I don't *think* we can include S2S in Final, which is > frustrating. We probably can include C2S, but with only one > client-side implementation it's playing a little fast and loose, I > think, and I'd much rather see SNI support server-side to feel > satisfied that SNI is actually covered. I just added partial support to ejabberd: https://github.com/processone/ejabberd/commit/c17ec50e3a989e3d8ceb78f94ee2a7d5eec5f7d3 Not sure if this is counted as THE IMPLEMENTATION, because incoming SNI is not processed (not a big deal if you have only a single virtual host, but a problem with multi-hosting deployments). _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
