As an Openfire developer, I can tell you that we find the naming "legacy"
for "direct SSL" unfortunate. We're planning to rename that. Direct SSL. I
happened to create an issue for that in our tracker yesterday:
https://issues.igniterealtime.org/projects/OF/issues/OF-1378

On 23 September 2017 at 14:58, 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamli...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> According to the documentations of some XMPP servers (e.g. OpenFire and
> ejabberd), using TLS directly when connecting is described as "legacy",
> "deprecated" or "not recommended". Is this "legacy" connection method the
> same as the one described in this XEP? If so, is this XEP also encouraging
> direct TLS unlike those servers?
>
>
> Guus der Kinderen 於 2017年09月23日 02:08 寫道:
>
>
> Wait, what are we discussing again?
>>
>>
> We were discussing if I was fully, or completely right, of course. :-P
>
> Also, I again have to postpone my bikeshed-warming-party. It's not
> finished yet. Will let you know.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Standards mailing list
> Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
> Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
> _______________________________________________
>
>
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________

Reply via email to