Le lundi 6 novembre 2017, 22:04:29 CET Daniel Gultsch a écrit : > 2017-11-06 21:58 GMT+01:00 Goffi <go...@goffi.org>: > > Le lundi 6 novembre 2017, 21:53:48 CET Daniel Gultsch a écrit : > >> 2017-11-06 21:46 GMT+01:00 Goffi <go...@goffi.org>: > >> > And you have no indication of markup, so if I copy/paste some code for > >> > instance, some client will render it with markup, > >> > >> I think it is possible to avoid those 'false positives' to some > >> degree. The limited amount of keywords and other rules (has to start > >> with whitespace, not interupted by newline) already work quite well. > >> If you come up with an example of a piece of code that will end up > >> being styled even though it is not supposed to we can maybe fix this > >> be slightly changing the rules. > > > > Are you suggesting to do heuristic to detect if if a text use a markup or > > not? > No I'm implying that the current syntax already has very few false > positives and we might be able to bring down the rate of false > positives even more by changing the syntax slightly. But for that to > work I need an example of a false positive.
"Wow, I can write in `monospace`, even a literal ``backtick (`)``!" _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
