2017-11-06 22:06 GMT+01:00 Goffi <go...@goffi.org>: > Le lundi 6 novembre 2017, 22:04:29 CET Daniel Gultsch a écrit : >> 2017-11-06 21:58 GMT+01:00 Goffi <go...@goffi.org>: >> > Le lundi 6 novembre 2017, 21:53:48 CET Daniel Gultsch a écrit : >> >> 2017-11-06 21:46 GMT+01:00 Goffi <go...@goffi.org>: >> >> > And you have no indication of markup, so if I copy/paste some code for >> >> > instance, some client will render it with markup, >> >> >> >> I think it is possible to avoid those 'false positives' to some >> >> degree. The limited amount of keywords and other rules (has to start >> >> with whitespace, not interupted by newline) already work quite well. >> >> If you come up with an example of a piece of code that will end up >> >> being styled even though it is not supposed to we can maybe fix this >> >> be slightly changing the rules. >> > >> > Are you suggesting to do heuristic to detect if if a text use a markup or >> > not? >> No I'm implying that the current syntax already has very few false >> positives and we might be able to bring down the rate of false >> positives even more by changing the syntax slightly. But for that to >> work I need an example of a false positive. > > "Wow, I can write in `monospace`, even a literal ``backtick > (`)``!"
I'm not really sure how you want this to be rendered or what this actually means but if you send me the text in between the " it will render like this: https://gultsch.de/files/monospace.png which seems fine?! But I meant more like provide an example of (valid) code you would actually paste in real life not some constructed example to 'break' the parser. cheers Daniel _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
