Related issue: JIDs are case-preserving, but case-insensitive. So the coloring should also be case-insensitive. Therefore, we probably need to normalize/downcase/similar the JIDs. Does the same apply to Nicks as well? On Fri, 2017-11-24 at 09:11 +0100, Jonas Wielicki wrote: > On Montag, 20. November 2017 09:09:48 CET Maxime Buquet wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > A few remarks regarding 0392 after having it implemented in poezio, > > thanks to Jonas. > > > > Using JIDs as the source for the hash brings at least an issue to > > me in > > MUCs. You'll see the same person in different colors depending on > > what room > > you're looking at. > > I found another issue with using the bare JID if known: on some IRC > transports, the bare JID will depend on the connection of the > participant, and > may vary on each join. Normally it would be preferable to have the > nick color > constant. > > So I now tend to use the nickname instead of the JID in MUCs. Does > anyone have > objections? > > kind regards, > Jonas_______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ -- Beste Grüße,
-Marcel Waldvogel University of Konstanz Distributed Systems Laboratory Efficient Secure and Private Collaboration
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
