* Jonas Wielicki <jo...@wielicki.name> [2017-11-24 09:13]: > So I now tend to use the nickname instead of the JID in MUCs. Does anyone > have > objections?
My first gut feeling was to only use the bare JID in non-anon MUCs (as opposed to "when it's known"), which would solve most of the consistency problems - except for the one with IRC transports using different server names in the JID. I'm sure the IRC transport problem can be resolved by using an ircnet tag instead of the explicit server name to ensure JID consistency (which has other significant benefits like roster-ability of frequently used contacts). However, after thinking some more about this, I'd rather have the color only depend on the nickname and not on the JID - if somebody is using different nicknames, this is probably on purpose and should be honored by the client. This then only leaves open the (in)consistency problem between private messages and MUCs, which I currently "solve" by using a fixed palette for private chats. Georg -- || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
