Thats why he wrote, it should only available for encrypted messages, because we have no way to delete messages from an archive.
Also you can not decrypt OMEMO encrypted messages a second time, so if you delete the message once from your device, its gone for good. The idea in combination with OMEMO, minus all the proposed "try to determine support on the other side" would be easy to implement and would work regards 2018-05-10 14:36 GMT+02:00 Ненахов Андрей <andrew.nenak...@redsolution.ru>: > 2018-05-10 17:31 GMT+05:00 VanitasVitae <vanitasvi...@riseup.net>: >> I'd also rather not tie it to OMEMO. > > By the way ,self-destructing messages should also be deleted from > message archives on both sender and recipients servers. For e2ee > messages one can argue that it's not really important if messages are > not deleted from server, however, it's just yet another way to make > such 'ephemeral' messages reappear on recipient's device - just by > reading from archive. > > > -- > Ненахов Андрей > Директор ООО "Редсолюшн" (Челябинск) > (351) 750-50-04 > http://www.redsolution.ru > _______________________________________________ > Standards mailing list > Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards > Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
