On 17/01/2019 10.19, Ненахов Андрей wrote:
I'd suggest not accepting XEPs without any kind of existing technical
implementation in the future. If one suggests a standard extension, he
should provide a working software that supports it.
This is explicitly not how our standards process has been set up. The
idea here is that having a published document as a starting point makes
it more likely that people are not entrenched in particular early design
choices, and discussion on those happen within the greater community.
Please have a good read of the rationale of the current process as
defined in XEP-0001.
Implementations for gaining more experience are encouraged, but not
required. The only transition that requires (2) implementations is from
Draft to Final.
> Also, XEP-0333 Chat Markers should not belong to deferred. It is
> widely used in XMPP clients.
I agree that this specification should probably be Proposed to move to
Draft.
The project I've been working on has gained us some insight and I think
that there are some things that could be explained better. E.g. the
interaction with message archiving.
--
ralphm
_______________________________________________
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards
Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org
_______________________________________________
