сб, 21 дек. 2019 г. в 16:21, Ralph Meijer <ral...@ik.nu>: > Just making sure everyone has the same interpretation: > > Case 1) The text has the sequence ]]>. In this case, in XML the > MUST be > escaped (with >, or equivalent character reference). > Case 2) All occurances of > not preceded by ]]. Here > MAY appear as-is, > or escaped. Both are valid. >
Well. We diverge here, and read it differently. MUST be escaped clause uses AND, it's is not optiona. The reason it MUST be escaped is _for compatibility_, and we are in a compatibility game, aren't we? For argument's sake, can you provide examples of XML processing libraries that work the way you describe and do not escape > all the time? We know none such, and we've tested dozens of them over the many years. Every single one always did the escaping. As I think it should, because consistency. -- Andrew Nenakhov CEO, redsolution, OÜ https://redsolution.com <http://www.redsolution.com>
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
