On 21.12.19 12:32, Andrew Nenakhov wrote: > > > сб, 21 дек. 2019 г. в 16:21, Ralph Meijer <ral...@ik.nu > <mailto:ral...@ik.nu>>: > > Just making sure everyone has the same interpretation: > > Case 1) The text has the sequence ]]>. In this case, in XML the > > MUST be escaped (with >, or equivalent character reference). > Case 2) All occurances of > not preceded by ]]. Here > MAY appear > as-is, or escaped. Both are valid. > > > Well. We diverge here, and read it differently. MUST be escaped clause > uses AND, it's is not optiona. The reason it MUST be escaped is _for > compatibility_, and we are in a compatibility game, aren't we? > > For argument's sake, can you provide examples of XML processing > libraries that work the way you describe and do not escape > all the > time? We know none such, and we've tested dozens of them over the many > years. Every single one always did the escaping. As I think it should, > because consistency.
Smack does not escape all the time: https://github.com/igniterealtime/Smack/blob/9d626bf787dc3e0e0a4399cef429285b22744d73/smack-core/src/main/java/org/jivesoftware/smack/util/StringUtils.java#L194 Also xmllint says that '>' in text is well-formed. $ echo "<example>></example>" | xmllint --noout - $ echo "<example><</example>" | xmllint --noout - -:1: parser error : StartTag: invalid element name <example><</example> ^ - Flrian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
