On Wed, 2024-05-29 at 13:02 +0000, Stephen Paul Weber wrote: > > A 1:1 chat *is* a groupchat with two participants. It's not a MUC but > as you > quoted the XEP says it doesn't have to be.
The XEP says that clients can assume it is MUC, but that it doesn't have to be. It has to be a "chatroom of any particular groupchat protocol". While you are free to argue that 1:1 chats are groupchats of a group of two and therefor regular chat messages form a groupchat protocol, I doubt it was intended that way by the authors (neither in XEP-0402 nor in any other XEP). What makes it still clear in the XEP, is that the bookmark must be of a *chatroom* of a groupchat protocol, and a regular user JID is certainly not a chatroom. The XEP is clearly hinting and a successor of MUC (like MIX) being potentially using it. Not that you use it for 1:1 chats. If there is really confusion about this and the word groupchat and you're not trying to make this up to retrofit this XEP, I suggest we put some official definitions of terms popularly used in XEPs up somewhere. _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list -- standards@xmpp.org To unsubscribe send an email to standards-le...@xmpp.org
