Hi Dave,

> On Sep 26, 2022, at 17:29, Dave Taht via Starlink 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 8:20 AM Livingood, Jason
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> The awareness & understanding of latency & impact on QoE is nearly unknown 
>> among reporters. IMO maybe there should be some kind of background briefings 
>> for reporters - maybe like a simple YouTube video explainer that is short & 
>> high level & visual? Otherwise reporters will just continue to focus on what 
>> they know...
> 
> That's a great idea. I have visions of crashing the washington
> correspondents dinner, but perhaps
> there is some set of gatherings journalists regularly attend?

        I would assume the relevant tech-journalists might be easier to catch 
at PR events at trade shows, or tech-related PR events like CES.
        However, starlink's own website does not seem to prominently advertise 
specific rates anyway, but does stress the latency advantage over geo 
stationary satellite links.
        The rest of the residential market however has been trained for decades 
now that the most relevant numbers are the maximal throughput* (well mostly 
downloads only), hence I can understand that articles will mention regressions 
of that number prominently. 
        I just stumbled over a German article 
(https://www.heise.de/news/Speedtests-Satelliteninternet-Starlink-teilweise-deutlich-langsamer-geworden-7275243.html)
 apparently presenting the same Ookla numbers for starlink containing a single 
short paragraph about latency increases, but without explaining their 
relevance, so exactly what you see in the other article as well; @Daniel 
anything we could do to make your colleague? Martin Holland more latency aware?

>> On 9/21/22, 14:35, "Starlink on behalf of Dave Taht via Starlink" 
>> <[email protected] on behalf of 
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>    I still find it remarkable that reporters are still missing the
>>    meaning of the huge latencies for starlink, under load.

        In their "defense" a similar level of latency-awareness is often 
displayed when talking about wired internet connections. (And from my 
perspective, I consider absolute latency somewhat less important than latency 
variation)


*) I am not trying to assign responsibility/blame here, I think both ISPs and 
customers jointly "selected" maximal contracted throughput as measure of choice 
to justify differential prices.




> 
> -- 
> FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

_______________________________________________
Starlink mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink

Reply via email to