I have just taught myself a lesson not to schedule deadlines over
holidays. Workgroup participation is spotty, and I am just now
getting back into this and a lot seems to have transpired that I have
not been following...
On Jan 17, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Shai Halevi wrote:
* It seems that there is wide agreement for adding the "ciphertext
stealing" method to handle odd-size sectors. This means that another
subsection should be added to each of 4.3 and 4.4 (and some more test
vectors should also be added). All of this should be doable within
the next week or so (I think).
While ciphertext stealing has been discussed (technically), do we
have consensus on how this will be used in the light of the T10 520
byte sector format?
I would hate to put this into the document and then have T10 say this
is of no use to them because our assumptions were naive?
Jim
