>> The word "attending" includes teleconferences. I noticed that. It has nothing to do with email discussions.
> -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: voting procedures for the working group to send P1619 on > to IEEE balloting? > From: james hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, February 04, 2006 11:10 pm > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: james hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SISWG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > The word "attending" includes teleconferences. > > On Feb 4, 2006, at 1:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >>> "Voting membership is granted after attending 2 meetings in the > >>> previous 12 months, including the current meeting." > > It does not look fair. Participating in email discussions should count > > as physically (or remotely) attending a meeting. > > > > Laszlo > > > >> -------- Original Message -------- > >> Subject: Re: voting procedures for the working group to send P1619 on > >> to IEEE balloting? > >> From: Fabio Maino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Date: Fri, February 03, 2006 9:32 pm > >> To: james hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Cc: Landon Noll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, SISWG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >> Attendance list is enclosed. > >> > >> Companies that have attended two meetings (marked in "bold" in the > >> excel > >> sheet) are entitled to vote. > >> > >> There are a few companies that have attended one meeting: Voting > >> rules > >> > >> state that "Voting membership is granted after attending 2 > >> meetings in > >> > >> the previous 12 months, including the current meeting." Those > >> companies > >> > >> will be then allowed to vote on the draft by attending next > >> meeting or > >> > >> conference call. > >> > >> Fabio > >> > >> james hughes wrote: > >> > >>> On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Landon Noll wrote: > >>> > >>>> Regarding the upcomming ballot for P1619 going on to IEEE > >> balloting: > >>>> > >>>> 1) Where can I find a list of those companies / represenatives who > >> > >>>> will be allowed to cast a vote? > >>>> Is there an official list somewhere? > >>> > >>> > >>> This information is held by Fabio Maino, the secretary. > >>> > >>>> 2) What is needed to gain concensus and send P1619 on to IEEE > >>>> balloting from the working group? > >>>> 50% of elegable voters? 2/3 of elegable voters? 50% of those > >> > >>>> present? 2/3 of those present? > >>>> Something else? > >>> > >>> > >>> For information about the work group balloting (and other) process > >>> see the document at > >>> http://www.siswg.org/P1619Procs.pdf > >>> > >>>> 3) Has the date been set for the vote? If so, when? > >>> > >>> > >>> we are hoping to vote on a document when it is ready to. This has > >>> not > >> > >>> occurred yet. > >>> > >>>> 4) Which draft document will we vote on? Where can I get a copy of > >> > >>>> the draft we will vote on? > >>> > >>> > >>> The yet to be specified document that will be ready. Sorry for the > >>> circular answers. The process that is going on is public. > >>> > >>>> Pardon these "new-bie" questions. I'm just trying to understand > >> the > >>>> process. > >>>> > >>>> chongo (Landon Curt Noll) /\oo/\ > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >>
