Hi Shai,
I have no problems with this switch, but I suspect a lot of other people have already made plans according to the schedule we decided on over two weeks ago. From the e-mail chain, I thought that some people who were interested in the 1619.1 meeting couldn't make the morning meeting.
-Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Shai Halevi
Sent: Sun 5/21/2006 4:37 AM
To: SISWG
Subject: Re: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting
Can we do the tape in the morning and the disk later? I cannot stay
on the call until 6pm and I would like to participate in the entire 1619.1
discussion. (Also, I believe that the work on 1619.1 is currently more
urgent, since we already sent 1619 to IEEE.)
-- Shai
On Wed, 3 May 2006 07:43 james hughes wrote:
> Seems like Tuesday works for most. Matt's suggestion
> 11-2 and 3-6, EDT.
> 8-11 and 12-3 PDT
> of morning for disk and afternoon for tape is a good one. I will get
> a teleconference bridge.
Title: RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Matt Ball
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Serge Plotkin
- Re: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Fabio Maino
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting laszlo
- Re: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting james hughes
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Kolovson, Curt
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Eric Hibbard
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Landon Noll
- Re: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Shai Halevi
- RE: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Matt Ball
- Re: Next P1619/1619.1 Meeting Jon Buckingham