Hello Paul
On 08-May-99, you wrote:
> Hello wurzel
>
> On 07-May-99, wurzel wrote:>
>
>> I have said this before and I'm not afraid to say it again. The fact
>> that STFax works on mine, and other people's systems, /proves
>> conclusively/ that the program works. The fact that it doesn't work on
>> some is purely down to one of these things:
>>
>> 1. The modem initialisation string (RTFM for the default!)
>> 2. The preferences settings of your STFax. RTFM & check them
> again.
>> 3. Whether you have CID enabled by your telco and your phone line.
>> 4. Whether your modem /is/ compatible (not all are).
>> 5. Whether you run system "hacks" which may interfere with STFax.
>> 6. Whether your Amiga is fast enough to cope (ie, is 14,400
>> enabled?)
>>
>> I really like STFax and would really like it to continue and improve.
>> As in all cases, if you want help from someone, ask them nicely.
>> Pretty please? ;)
>
>
> I agree and find Stfax stable, I have had small problems mostly with
> recieving faxes (due to settings) but find Wiz very helpfull if you email
> him chris very rarely replies.
>
> I have come to the conclusion the problem is not with Stfax itself but
> with the Docs. There is not enough info on setting up Stfax, the main
> problem is the init string but how does the average person set it up when
> they do not know what to look for eg. does Stfax want RTS/CTS or XON/XOFF
> on or off
> What S: registers may need changing for different modems.
>
> I know Wiz can not set all the init string for every modem with every
> config. of Amiga but a little more help in the docs. to know what to look
> for would help the people that do have a problem.
>
>
>
Regards
--
Here here, couldn`t agree more !
Darron
FT Multimedia
Partner.
--
STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax
ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX"
ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
