> I really would like to see getting STFaxPro the same reliability I can
> achieve with this old AVM; that's the reason why I bought it and still
care
> about it's development, just to make things clear.
Well, it is the age-old argument of 'reliability'. Ok, a few on this list
(you must note it is a FEW on this list) have problems, but many have no
problems at all.
Me, Neil Bothwick and Ben Vost - three high-profile STFax users - have very
few problems, if any, with the core features of STFax.
So, therefore to us it *is* very reliable.
Sorry, but those are my feelings.
Chris.
--
STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax
ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX"
ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
