On 25-Oct-99 18:02:45, You said about;
>> I best go get my ears checked then. Ahem.
>Good idea. But first, make sure that you are playing back the raw wav files
>at the correct frequency - as these are genuinely very high quality (well,
>certainly quite high quality).
Well, I'll see if I can try a different wav datatype first, when I get
chance. I am playing through my hi-fi and not `computer speakers', so
that may make a difference.
>One note:
>The company that produced these samples are a *professional* voice-over
>company who produce voice-overs for the BBC, local radio and local companies
>(in the West Midlands area)! They certainly know what they are doing ;)
Don't get me wrong, there's nothing wrong with the actual messages per
se, she has a nice voice and is well spoken, etc. It's just that the
WAVs themselves seemed a little on the `tinny' side and `hissy' on the
`S's, IYSWIM. Again, I suppose thois could be more noticable than normal
as I'm playing them through my hi-fi...
Apart from that, they are definitely usable and STFax4 works well, I'd
certainly recommend it to anyone.
--
Andy Mills,
Bristol, UK.
--
Help! I'm trapped in a Chinese computer factory!
--
STFax Mailing List - http://www.active-net.co.uk/products/stfax
ML-Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP" or "LONGINDEX"
ML-Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "DEL" in mail body
