Crispin,

You say right at the end that "Pelletized grass can be used in /*any*/ pellet stove or furnace."

I do not believe that this is generally true. High ash grass pellets could be a big problem. Many stoves cannot handle high ash content fuels, and more ash means much more maintenance**.

Clinkers are where the combustion temperature of the fire exceeds the melting point of the ash in the fuel pellet (esp. with chlorine and potassium), and the silicates within the ash will bind together to form a glass like mass. When ash melts it forms a glob of sticky material that cools hard. If a fuel has a lot of ash with a low melting point a clinker will form, and this will have to be manually removed, which increases maintenance**. ("Slag" is the name used for a similar material which collects around the heat exchanger pipes, and reduces heat exchange, and thus performance.)

**You might end up having to give it a serious cleaning every 6 hours or so, in order for the stove to continue functioning.

Ash clinker formations are usually associated with biomass pellet fuels such as grass and straw pellets. If the ash content of these pellets is too high and the ash melts and form clinkers you could be looking at a big loss on fuel -- as well as a big mess inside your stove. Clinkers can end up blocking the air holes of the incoming air which can upset the mixture of air and fuel. Incorrect adjustment of the air to fuel ratio can then greatly increase the likelihood of more clinker formation. This is due to the stoves inability to adequately burn the excess fuel and remove the excess ash that is building up in the burn pot.

Not very many simple stoves that I know of that can correctly handle very high ash fuel pellets. Even most of the more expensive commercially available pellet stoves in North America and Europe (designed to burn wood pellets) have no means of dealing with high ash content (except Perhaps a for Harman corn stoves, Dell-Point Industries Europa stoves or the Country Flame Technologies Harvester stoves).

A simple TLUD with its "flaming pyrolysis" should not create clinkers and will result in a biochar residue that should also not be too alkaline (and so hopefully can be placed directly into soil or compost without worrying too much about changes to the pH).

  Lloyd Helferty, Engineering Technologist
  Principal, Biochar Consulting (Canada)
  www.biochar-consulting.ca
  603-48 Suncrest Blvd, Thornhill, ON, Canada
  905-707-8754; 647-886-8754 (cell)
     Skype: lloyd.helferty
  Steering Committee member, Canadian Biochar Initiative
  President, Co-founder&  CBI Liaison, Biochar-Ontario
    Advisory Committee Member, IBI
  http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=1404717
  http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=42237506675
  http://groups.google.com/group/biochar-ontario
  http://www.meetup.com/biocharontario/
  http://grassrootsintelligence.blogspot.com
   www.biochar.ca

Biochar Offsets Group: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=2446475


On 9/15/2010 6:32 PM, Crispin Pemberton-Pigott wrote:
Dear Friends

First a tip of the hat to Dean for pointing out that stoves can be designed to 
produce char or not.

I remind everyone to please look at the whole equation of a problem , not just 
a part and then make claims. In some cases one might want to create char and 
some not, for example when cooking at a low heat for a long time.

RWL - Crispin, being a climate denier, should not be taken as the final
word on these issues. Biochar in many places is giving a doubling of soil
productivity for centuries not just the first year, when there is a need
for twice as much fuel.
I agree with Ron on this: there is a lot of support for the idea that char 
increases growth of plants. Alex English and I had a long conversation a couple 
of weeks ago and he report that some plant diseases are limited by an increased 
ability of the plant to cope with infections if there is char in the soil. 
Personally I think it has to be in the form of char, not carbon in general. I 
know some Permaculture stalwarts who think the answer lies in composting done 
correctly.

The point I was making is that claims are being made for char making stoves to 
simultaneously save fuel, save trees and produce significant amounts of char. 
The energy and efficiency math does not support this, interesting as char is as 
a soil amendment.

I have already pointed out that in order to get 'meaningful' (as promoted in 
the literature) quantities of char from a stove means fertilising a potted 
plant, not a field.

But as Nathan Mulcahy has been emphasizing, the fuels for pyrolyzing
stoves need not be wood at all. And for charcoal consuming stoves -
almost certainly obtained from wood, the gain of pyrolyzing stoves is
even greater.
As AD Karve has shown, charcoal fuels can easily be made from agricultural 
waste and the whole system creates employment as well - basically out of 
nothing. Let us not toss that system aside too easily.

RWL The last part is indeed true - but I am pretty sure that trees
generally produce more than grasses on an annual basis.
It is Roger who has conclusively shown that grasses significantly outperform 
trees.

Melting permafrost allows for a huge increase in biomass per sq metre and the 
tree line used to be much farther north than it is now only 6000 years ago. One 
expects that this can also grow grasses for biofuel. Right Roger??

But grasses are pretty hard to use in all but pyrolyzing stoves.
Pelletized grass can be used in any pellet stove or furnace. It is also worth 
the energy to create the pellets which is harder to say about wood.

Regards
Crispin



_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_listserv.repp.org
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org
http://info.bioenergylists.org

UNSUBSCRIBE HERE;
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_listserv.repp.org


_______________________________________________
Stoves mailing list
[email protected]
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_listserv.repp.org
http://stoves.bioenergylists.org
http://info.bioenergylists.org

UNSUBSCRIBE HERE;
http://listserv.repp.org/mailman/listinfo/stoves_listserv.repp.org

Reply via email to