I agree wholeheartedly with your first point. However, I think that the second point might be a bad thing. The reason I say this is because people validate Struts based off of who's running/using it. There's probably a question a week on the user list where someone is trying to convince their boss to use Struts and wants example sites and companies using it for purposes of proving that Struts is a tried and true product. I also think that most of theses sites are not *able* to list the info you mention for whatever reason (marketing doesn't allow etc.)
My vote is +++1 for point 1 and -1 for point 2. Just my $0.02. -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's probably time we raised the bar a bit on the > Consultants and > Powered By listings. > > I was thinking of posting this to the User list: > > <> > > Please note that beginning 2002-June-30, any page > linked as a Struts > Consultants on the Resource page must specifically > mention that they > offer Struts consulting. Listings that do not > reference Struts will be > removed. > > Please note that beginning 2002-July-31, any page > linked as being > Powered by Struts must credit Struts or the Apache > Software foundation > (e.g., "This product includes software developed by > the Apache Software > Foundation"). Listings that do not reference Struts > or the ASF will be > removed. > > </> > > -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY US > -- Developing Java Web Applications with Struts > -- Tel: +1 585 737-3463 > -- Web: http://husted.com/about/services > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience http://launch.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
