For the record, I'm with David. A beta is a beta. Any application advanced enough to be using ApplicationConfig directly is advanced enough to do a little renaming when moving from b2 to b3.
I support the commitment to provide backward compatability between releases; but, IMHO, backward compatability between betas is an oxymoron. Though reasonable people can disagree =:0), and I can understand why others might want to err on the side of conservation. -Ted. 11/25/2002 10:07:15 AM, David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >My personal preference is to remove ApplicationConfig altogether since it >hasn't been in a release but other committers don't feel the same way. I >empathize with your situation but you need to educate your QA people that >they're being rediculous (easier said than done). > >David -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
