I don't agree I'm afraid. I'm also fairly aware of the difference between CSS and XHTML. Try this in Netscape 4.x and then in IE 4-6.
<html><body>Line 1<br/>Line2</body></html> Matt. Quoting "Hajratwala, Nayan (N.)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I think this is a very common misconception. It is very likely that the > problems you were experiencing with XHTML were because of CSS that was > not supported by netscape. > > XHTML is very cross-browser friendly, and if you use XHTML transitional, > then you can still even use the dreaded <font> tags if you want. =) > > My suggestion would be that the <html:html> tag generate > XHTML-transitional by default and have a "type" attribute that can be > set to "strict", "transitional", or "frameset" as needed. > > --- > - Nayan Hajratwala > - Chikli Consulting LLC > - http://www.chikli.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Read [mailto:mread@;spotd.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:33 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: Re: HTML, XML, XHTML and <html:html> > > > In my experience XHTML does not work in older browsers, specifically > Netscape > 4.x and I would be very concerned if an upgrade to Struts 1.1 gave me no > choice > in using XHTML. > > Matt. > > Quoting David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > XML compliant HTML is XHTML. I don't think we need the xhtml > attribute > > for > > the tag anymore. Because xhtml works in current and older browsers, > I > > think > > the tags should produce it every time. Many people do not use the > > <html:html> tag so it doesn't make sense to require that to use > xhtml. > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Subject: HTML, XML, XHTML and <html:html> > > >Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:43:30 -0700 > > > > > >I'm a little confused about what's going on with our HTML taglib. I > > see > > >changes being made so that the tags always output valid XML, > regardless > > of > > >the value of the 'xhtml' attribute of the <html:html> tag. > > > > > >Have we decided that we don't need that attribute any more, and > we'll > > just > > >always output XHTML, or is there a difference that I'm missing > > between > > >generating XML-compliant HTML and generating XHTML? > > > > > >-- > > >Martin Cooper > > > > > > > > >-- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > ><mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > > >For additional commands, e-mail: > > ><mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Get faster connections -- switch to MSN Internet Access! > > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:struts-dev-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
