Ok, color me confused.

Why then is are the validator methods being called with an
ActionMessages object rather than an ActionErrors object?
That's what was breaking things.

(This is what happens when you step away to deal with the
Real World for a few months...)

James 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:35 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: RE: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on
Validator 1.1.0
> 
> Only ActionError was deprecated, not ActionErrors.  We
still 
> need to use ActionErrors because the ActionForm.validate()

> method returns an instance of that class.  ActionMessage 
> should be used instead of ActionError though.
> 
> David
> 
> --- James Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 here too
> > 
> > Also note that in deprecating ActionErrors (whomever did
that, it's 
> > lost in the bowels of my e-mail archive), it broke all
the default 
> > validators because they had ActionErrors in their method

> signatures.  
> > I released a fix for it today.
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:07 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [Short Term Plan] Struts to depend on
> > Validator 1.1.0
> > > 
> > > +1
> > > 
> > > > Over 99% of commons-validator usage is through
struts.
> > In
> > > fact it may
> > > > be  100%.
> > > > I feel the only way to really promote
commons-validator
> > to
> > > Beta status
> > > > is to make the nightly build of struts depend on the
> > 1.1.0 version
> > > > which has  released in August and been designated an
> > Alpha. 
> > > I propose
> > > > that this Sunday Sept 28 th that  we switch over to
the
> > > 1.1.0 version
> > > > of Validator, then quickly release Version 1.1.1
which
> > has had
> > > > additional numerious improvements in it's Javascript
> > validation.
> > > >
> > > > Othewise I honestly see how Validator 1.1.0 is ever
> > going to get
> > > > enough usage to ever be promoted to beta status.
> > > >
> > > > Reactions.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> >
------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search 
> http://shopping.yahoo.com
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to