Bartley, Chris P [PCS] wrote: >>I'll agree to disagree if you will ;-) >> >I won't give up that easily! :D Seriously, my complaint stems from the >fact that it's just as valid to do the following to populate a (so-called) >"form" bean (that has setBar() and setBaz() methods): > > <a href="/foo.do?bar=1&baz=2">Click me</a> > >Where's your "form" now? ;) You don't see a disconnect there? > touche ... point well taken. However, (arguably) their primary use is for forms ...
However, not wanting to argue any further :-) I'll concede that your name is just as appropriate - having looked at it from your perspective. >See, my whole point is that the primary purpose of these beans is to >encapsulate parameters sent via an HTTP GET or POST request. And we all >(hopefully) know that an HTML <form> isn't the only way to make such a >request. > >So, with that, i'm done, and happy to agree to disagree. :) > >chris > Peace :-) -- Eddie Bush -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
