Alrighty, I know how to make it crash (don't fret Arron, I don't believe 'tis a
<nested> issue)
When I went a-sleuthing I noticed that the usage in my real app is slightly different
from the two <nested:root> sections in my demo; instead, it is like this:
<nested:root name="x">
<nested:write
property="something-from-x"/>
</nested:root>
<html:form action="foo">
<nested:write
property="something-from-the-form-bean"/>
</html:form>
When I plugged modified my demo app to use this format lo-and-behold it blew chunks.
That's when I noticed that I was using an <html:form> and not a <nested:form> which is
what I needed for the stuff inside the form. I changed it to use <nested:form> and
now both the demo and the real app are humming mellifluously. Woohoo!
So, in summary, the above format will not work. Haven't looked at the innards of
<nested:write> to see how it interprets things when it is inside an <html:form>.
Sri
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arron Bates [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 6:39 PM
> To: Struts Users Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [ANN?] New Nested Tags -or- Nesters, lend me
> your containers...
>
>
> You had me going there for a bit. Even made another test war
> to do exactly what your snippet prescribed, but as long as
> it's working.
>
> Hope the other app turns out to be not my issue too... :P
> Waitin for the word...
>
> Arron.
>
>
> > Never mind...
> >
> > I had updated the WEB-INF/lib of ap-1 and tested ap-2....
> >
> > My test app works with the new nested jar in place. However I am
> > still
> having problems with the real application; I will take a
> closer look at it 'morrow and keep you posted.
> >
> > Sri
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
