If you like Torque, you would LOVE CommonsSQL in the commons CVS sandbox.

.V

Mitchell Morris wrote:
Please summarize your findings to the list, if you would; I would
be interested in seeing the group consensus on Torque as well.

From following Jetspeed and Turbine user lists it seems that
there's a lot of confusion about where the various Turbine projects
are going especially with respect to Avalon. In my professional
caution, I discarded Torque as a candidate persistence layer
because of the organizational uncertainty that I thought I saw. I
would be delighted to find out that I was overly hasty.

+Mitchell


-----Original Message-----
From: Petrus, Christian (CORP, GEITC)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 11:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: STRUTS with TORQUE


Hello All,


Thanks for all the help in this list.

We are rewriting an entire swing application and we have chosen Struts for
the new web version of the product.


For the database handling part, we are planning to use Torque. Does anyone
have experience working with Struts / Torque or have Information especially
on what can go wrong with this combo? Torque seems to be too good and easy
to be true!!!


Any info. would be greatly appreciated!!

Thanks in advance,
Christian




"THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE ALONG WITH ANY ATTACHMENTS IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE
ADDRESSEE and may contain confidential and privileged information.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient,
you are notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly Prohibited. If you have received this message by error, please notify us immediately, return the original mail to the sender and delete the message from your system."






--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to