Here it is:
--- StringArrayConverter.java.orig 2003-03-21 04:43:17.000000000 -0500
+++ StringArrayConverter.java 2003-03-21 04:43:20.000000000 -0500
@@ -113,6 +113,10 @@
// ------------------------------------------------------- Static Variables
+ /**
+ * <p> Model object for int arrays.</p>
+ */
+ private static int ints[] = new int[0];
/**
* <p>Model object for type comparisons.</p>
@@ -149,6 +153,19 @@
return (value);
}
+ // Deal with the input value as an int array
+ if (ints.getClass() == value.getClass())
+ {
+ int[] values = (int[]) value;
+ String[] results = new String[values.length];
+ for (int i = 0; i < values.length; i++)
+ {
+ results[i] = new
StringBuffer().append(values[i]).toString();
+ }
+
+ return (results);
+ }
+
// Parse the input value as a String into elements
// and convert to the appropriate type
try {
As you can see, it was just necessary to check to see if an int[]
was passed to the converter. Now this class mirrors its inverse,
IntegerArrayConvertor.java which first checks for a String[] to be
passed in, and then works with a String (in the format {2,3,4}).
Obviously if you pass in an int[] you want to get out the exact same
values converted to a String[] and as you can see, it is failproof
since StringBuffer can deal with any type.
Dan
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Daniel Allen, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.mojavelinux.com/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
"Personally, I'm not finding Windows
to be less expensive to administer,
but those security holes--that'll kill 'em,"
-- Al Gillen, IDC
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
