See below: > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Coast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 03 June 2003 07:15 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: Re: struts tags vs jstl > > > thanks > > so, if I understand it right..... > > you would use <c:forEach items=""> rather than <logic:iterate name=""... > > and behind the scenes the class implementing the c:forEach is a > struts-el class?
No, <c:*> as in "core" from JSTL. > > or should you call the tags their struts names but jstl attributes? > > <logic-el:iterate items-""> We tend not to use logic-el tags, only html-el and JSTL for everything else, so this would be a <c:forEach>. > > if the latter, what are the preferred prefixes for the el tags? the same > as their struts counterparts or with some el prefix or suffix? We prefer to still use <html:*> for struts-el: easier to type, remember and you're unlikely to ever want to mix "html" and "html-el" on the same page or even in same app. > > cheers > Nathan > > David M. Karr wrote: > >>>>>>"Nathan" == Nathan Coast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > Nathan> is this documented somewhere? ie which tags have / > haven't been ported > > > > As other posters implied, if both a Struts tag and a JSTL tag > overlap, the tag > > wasn't ported to Struts-EL, in general. The README.txt file in > the "struts-el" > > directory tries to list what tags were not ported, and why. > > > > Note that there were some problems in the RC1 release of > Struts-EL, so you > > should probably use the nightly build, or wait until RC2. > > > > Nathan> James Norman wrote: > > >> I'm pretty sure that the latest release of Struts > includes a subset of > > >> Struts tags that have been configured to support the EL > Expression language. > > >> This is the expression language that is built into JSTL. > I think that only > > >> the Struts tags that don't have equivalents in the JSTL > have been ported. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --- > Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.486 / Virus Database: 284 - Release Date: 29/05/2003 > --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.487 / Virus Database: 286 - Release Date: 01/06/2003 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
