Hi, What he is doing is not action chainning..Its action relay...There was a long long discussion about the same..And the final verdict was action chainning is bad but not action relay...This was the opinion given by Ted husted himself... The mail archive has the relevant thread if you are interested..
-----Original Message----- From: Dirk Markert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:10 PM To: Struts Users Mailing List Subject: Re[4]: Forwarding to a tile definition Hallo Greg, do not use action chaining. If you have to, then use <forward name="myaction" path="/myaction.do" /> with your return(mapping.findForward("myaction")) Dirk *************************************************************** GFM> On Jun 12, 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: GFM> |ya..I think what you are saying is right..So in that case only way to forward GFM> | to a definition tho^rough a link tag is as u said...Define a forward to go GFM> | to a action and make that action forward to definition..Using some forwardin GFM> | g action from scaffold package i suppose. GFM> Ok, I remember what the issue with the action was. GFM> In my action, I am doing a return(mapping.findForward("myaction")) and GFM> it appears not to work (I get a blank page). GFM> How does one return to an action, not a forward? GFM> Thanks, GFM> /greg GFM> -- GFM> Gregory F. March -=- http://www.gfm.net:81/~march -=- AIM:GfmNet GFM> --------------------------------------------------------------------- GFM> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GFM> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
