JBoss is crap, anyway. -----Original Message----- From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:44 AM
This isn't the case for jboss at least. You gain major performance increases. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 09 October 2003 10:35 Yes, the advantage of using local interfaces in EJBs is avoiding the creation of stubs and skeletons, use of RMI and serialization. But what many people don't realize is that all the major containers have been doing this since 1.1 anyway, abeit in proprietary ways. You really gain no performance advantage by explicitly declaring an EJB interface local - you merely adhere to the specification. Mark -----Original Message----- From: Kunal H. Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:20 PM The CMP2.x spec allows declaring EJBs as local objects. The advantage of the local EJB objects is that they don't get serialized/deserialized(I think) and pass-by-reference and not by-value. Effectively, If you use a LocalEJB, you have the flexibitly of making the REMOTE with very few changes to code. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
