Thank you Harm. I agree with your assessment of JBoss. JBoss is also a great value (although I think they should charge some nominal fee to insure the viability of their organization; see Alan Williamson's August editorial in JDJ). :)
Under what circumstances would you recommend the use of EJB? Mike --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > For what it is worth, I think JBoss is great. It is a very mature > application server. > People who claim it's crap obiviously don't know what they are talking > about. > I agree, JBoss is not the only application server around, and maybe not > the best application server. > > But to claim it is "crap" is definitly wrong. Especially if you don't back > up your staments with some arguments. > > JBoss is great to develop on (hot deployment), it's very fast, it comes > with 2 integrated Servlet containers (Jetty or Tomcat), a great management > interface (jmx-console), and I could go on some more. > > Cheers, > > Harm de Laat > Informatiefabriek > The Netherlands > > > > > "Brian McSweeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 10/09/2003 03:37 PM > Please respond to > "Struts Users Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To > "'Struts Users Mailing List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > cc > > Subject > RE: ejb's and tomcat > > > > > > > I agree, but I was responding to your "jboss is crap" statement, which > also has little to do with entity beans. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 11:41 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat > > That's an improvement, but really has little to do with EJB entity > beans. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 8:33 AM > To: 'Struts Users Mailing List' > Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat > > > Can't really agree with that. Besides, jboss have just employed the > creator of hibernate and its CMP layer is going to be powered by > hibernate in the near future anyway. So if you're a fan of hibernate, > you'll get the same thing under the hood with jboss and CMP ejbs. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 11:08 > To: Struts Users Mailing List > Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat > > JBoss is crap, anyway. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:44 AM > > This isn't the case for jboss at least. You gain major performance > increases. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 10:35 > > Yes, the advantage of using local interfaces in EJBs is avoiding the > creation of stubs and skeletons, use of RMI and serialization. But what > many people don't realize is that all the major containers have been > doing > this since 1.1 anyway, abeit in proprietary ways. You really gain no > performance advantage by explicitly declaring an EJB interface local - > you > merely adhere to the specification. > > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kunal H. Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:20 PM > > The CMP2.x spec allows declaring EJBs as local objects. > > The advantage of the local EJB objects is that they don't get > serialized/deserialized(I think) and pass-by-reference and not by-value. > > Effectively, If you use a LocalEJB, you have the flexibitly of making > the REMOTE with very few changes to code. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
