then which one is good in your eyes? >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 4:38 PM >To: Struts Users Mailing List >Subject: RE: ejb's and tomcat > > >JBoss is crap, anyway. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Brian McSweeney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:44 AM > >This isn't the case for jboss at least. You gain major performance >increases. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Galbreath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: 09 October 2003 10:35 > >Yes, the advantage of using local interfaces in EJBs is avoiding the >creation of stubs and skeletons, use of RMI and serialization. But what >many people don't realize is that all the major containers have been >doing >this since 1.1 anyway, abeit in proprietary ways. You really gain no >performance advantage by explicitly declaring an EJB interface local - >you >merely adhere to the specification. > >Mark > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kunal H. Parikh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 8:20 PM > >The CMP2.x spec allows declaring EJBs as local objects. > >The advantage of the local EJB objects is that they don't get >serialized/deserialized(I think) and pass-by-reference and not by-value. > >Effectively, If you use a LocalEJB, you have the flexibitly of making >the REMOTE with very few changes to code. > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
