Di On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > On June 4, 2014 11:48:18 AM Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Em qua 04 jun 2014, às 15:35:28, Tomaz Canabrava escreveu: >> > > that's pretty much the case. >> > > at least recently, i've tried building marble and subsurface with >> > > Qt5.3 natively on win32 and that worked out well. >> > With Thiago's "ok" we can default subsurface to Qt5. >> >> No objections from me. > > > We just need to make sure it can build with Qt4 as well. I don't think we > can make it look for Qt5 and build against Qt4 if that is missing. > It all depends on which qmake binary you call, iirc
CMake can - but that can create another problem: what if I have the Qt - dev for qt5 and marble installed for Qt4, and such. > /D > > > > > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
