On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 04:13:46PM -0300, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > Di > > On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: > > On June 4, 2014 11:48:18 AM Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Em qua 04 jun 2014, às 15:35:28, Tomaz Canabrava escreveu: > >> > > that's pretty much the case. > >> > > at least recently, i've tried building marble and subsurface with > >> > > Qt5.3 natively on win32 and that worked out well. > >> > With Thiago's "ok" we can default subsurface to Qt5. > >> > >> No objections from me. > > > > > > We just need to make sure it can build with Qt4 as well. I don't think we > > can make it look for Qt5 and build against Qt4 if that is missing. > > It all depends on which qmake binary you call, iirc > > CMake can - but that can create another problem: what if I have the Qt > - dev for qt5 and marble installed for Qt4, and such. > That's why I think that trying to automatically force versions might be a problem.
I think what "switching to Qt5" really means is that I should work on my Windows and Mac builds to switch THOSE to Qt5 and that I need to build both here when testing patches. /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
