On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Lubomir I. Ivanov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 June 2014 02:56, Dirk Hohndel <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 01:26:19AM +0200, roberto forini wrote: >>> I will try to do the bugtrack. >> >> Thanks >> >>> > > 4) printing the dives could be useful have a space between divelogs just >>> > to >>> > > make space on the border for punching. (different layout depending on >>> > > number of dives in the same page) see divelog.de on the print empty log >>> > > pages. >>> > >>> > Can you say more what you have in mind here? >>> >>> If you print the dives you probably put into a book with rings. So you need >>> to make holes for the ring and holes need spaces. Just go on the divelogs.de >>> on the "empty log to print" web page and you will understand what i'm >>> clumsy trying to explain! ;) sorry for my bad english!! >> >> I get it. Yes, there is SO MUCH that could be done to make our printing >> more useful. Lubomir was working on that but it seems his day job has >> swallowed him. >> > > that's pretty much the case. > at least recently, i've tried building marble and subsurface with > Qt5.3 natively on win32 and that worked out well.
With Thiago's "ok" we can default subsurface to Qt5. > lubomir > -- > _______________________________________________ > subsurface mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list [email protected] http://lists.hohndel.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
