On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:00:13AM +0200, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Le 22/09/2017 à 12:24, Dirk Hohndel a écrit : > > As we start thinking about the next release (never mind that we still > > haven't managed to get Subsurface-mobile 2.0 out the door), one of my > > concerns is lack of testing of the binaries that I create. > > > > Right now I'm building Windows (that gets a decent amount of testing it > > seems), Mac (not as much), Ubuntu (very little), openSUSE/Fedora (any?). > > I still haven't wrestled appImages into submission (definitely on my > > critical path towards 4.7). > > > > If you are regularly / occasionally testing any of these builds, could you > > respond here, please? > > I test occasionally the openSUSE daily/beta builds. > (Sorry for the late reply).
No worries, I'm happy you revived the thread, actually :-) I still need to find time to fix the remaining build issues for all the Linux variations that we support... what worries me the most is the AppImage as I got stuck there the last time I tried. I think openSUSE is the one that already works well :-) /D _______________________________________________ subsurface mailing list subsurface@subsurface-divelog.org http://lists.subsurface-divelog.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/subsurface
