-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: >On 2/11/09, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:24:20AM -0500, Luke Faraone wrote: >>>On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>>> Debian POV: Someone needs to volunteer packaging >>>> "sugar-etoys-activity". Drop an email to >>>> [email protected] . >>>> >>>> Ubuntu POV: Someone needs to volunteer hacking[1] together a sugar >>>> activity package until a Debian package can be adopted. More info >>>> at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SugarTeam >>>> >>>> I recommend helping as "upstream" as possible instead of only >>>> locally for Ubuntu. YMMV.
[details back and forth snipped] >Maybe we're just thick, but neither Morgan nor I were able to use your >git README.packaging to upgrade a package to a new upstream version. >It doesn't matter wheter we were upgrading sugar-base or Pippy. > >It seems that the file is missing some steps; moreover, how can we be >expected to package new activities with git when even the steps for >maintaining existing ones are lacking. Maybe it is me who are thick. Let's see if I understand it correctly: 1) You consider packaging Pippy and sugar-base my way equally complex. 2) Failure to understand my way of sugar-base packaging is your reason for not packaging *anything* in *any* way through Debian. Or did I miss something? - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkmTJD0ACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgVKACeOlcvrypk9ENwzMaO/4IO1nu2 DYgAn39Vp/oFchHoA52j6Nso5puJY8AM =cx7E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
