On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 04:47:07PM +0100, Martin Dengler wrote: > I'm not saying the existing Taxonomy is the sexiest or > most-comprehensible-to-the-outsider, but it's well-aligned with the > development/deployment processes and if we promote a completely > orthogonal categorization it may cause a troublesome impedence > mismatch.
This came out wrong: a *completely" orthogonal categorization / tag set can be very sensible and could be great for the target audience. A not-so-completely orthogonal one could cause confusion. More tersely: s/completely/incompletely/. Sorry for any conflagrations. I think it'd be great if there were categorizations that were super-useful to Learners / etc. regarless of their utility to developers. > > thanks > > > > Sean > > Martin
pgp7eoMQqnYX1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
