On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 07:08:45PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote: > FWIW, I have tried and failed to understand fructose, glucose, honey, > etc. When I get around to writing a little Activity I guess I'll climb > that learning curve. > > I'm sure it's a useful classification system, but I don't think > teachers, parents, or Learners need any level of system architecture > detail. Simpler is better. true, maybe "Basic" I guess "Preinstalled" doesn't make sense as well (for example in openSUSE we have ~40 preinstalled activities:)
> If tagging is possible for each Activity, yup, it should work > perhaps it would be better > to do that? a simple search on "fructose" would return the list, > right? in current code there is a restriction of 3 simultaneously pinned tags I guess in that case we should increase this limit :) > > Sean > > > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Aleksey Lim<alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 05:34:29PM +0200, Sean DALY wrote: > >> I think that's a great idea - will be very helpful in identifying the > >> "classics". > > I've created Fructose(but not sure about name) category for that reason > > > >> > >> i don't mind trying to write the instructions if someone else can edit > >> & post them. > >> > >> thanks > >> > >> Sean > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:37 PM, James Simmons<jim.simm...@walgreens.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Sean, > >> > > >> > I had another thought. Activities can be included in up to three > >> > categories > >> > on ASLO. So, in addition to GCompris we could also have a "Core" > >> > category > >> > (or "Pre-Installed" or some other agreed upon phrase) that would include > >> > all > >> > the Activities that are installed by default. This would showcase our > >> > most > >> > essential Activities and also give people a place to download stuff they > >> > may > >> > have removed by mistake. > >> > > >> > When I first got my XO I didn't have a wireless router, so I had to copy > >> > everything in using a thumb drive. I agree that some simple instructions > >> > would be worthwhile. > >> > > >> > James Simmons > >> > > >> > Sean DALY wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Yes, that's the procedure when running Sugar and using Browse... which > >> >> I wasn't doing. A couple of phrases removing the mystery will help us; > >> >> it's a lowering-the-barriers issue... we can't assume everyone will > >> >> alertly figure it out. > >> >> > >> >> Sean > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > -- > > Aleksey > > > -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel