On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Frederick Grose<[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Simon Schampijer <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Hi Fred, >> >> it might makes sense to trim down our long wiki names. As we heavily use >> categories now - this might not be an issue. How about we do: >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84 -> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Roadmap >> >> and >> >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Releases/Sucrose/0.84 >> -> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Notes >> >> same for 0.82 and 0.86. >> >> What do you think? Can you do this without breaking current links?
Makes sense to me. It might also be nice to support the child-friendly (or, really, non-developer-friendly) codenames as well, so, that we have a page for the "Strawberry" release of Sugar that has a little summary, points to the release notes, has a download link, etc. Maybe it would be best to put these in their own namespace, but still at a shorter path: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Releases/Strawberry (?) Eben >> Regards, >> Simon > > That should be possible and fits with the idea that DFarning reported of > broadening the involvement in the platform development. > > I'll start with 0.82, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.82, and leave wiki > redirects to catch those linking from off-site links in blogs and other > references. > > --Fred > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
