On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Frederick Grose<fgr...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Simon Schampijer <si...@schampijer.de> > wrote: >> >> Hi Fred, >> >> it might makes sense to trim down our long wiki names. As we heavily use >> categories now - this might not be an issue. How about we do: >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84 -> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Roadmap >> >> and >> >> >> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Releases/Sucrose/0.84 >> -> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Notes >> >> same for 0.82 and 0.86. >> >> What do you think? Can you do this without breaking current links? >> >> Regards, >> Simon > > That should be possible and fits with the idea that DFarning reported of > broadening the involvement in the platform development. > > I'll start with 0.82, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.82, and leave wiki > redirects to catch those linking from off-site links in blogs and other > references.
Yes, this transition make sense now. The original idea behind the strict hierarchy was to introduce 'wiki discipline' Unmaintained wikis tend to sprawl into messes because some authors create pages without looking to see if other similar pages already exist. Once the sprawl starts, it quickly gets out of hand. Now that Fred is tending the wiki and the basic disciple is established, it makes sense to relax the rules a bit. Call for help - - If any new participants are interested in learning more about Sugar and Sugar Labs, a few hours helping Fred tend the wiki would be a great place to get involved:) david > --Fred > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > -- David Farning Sugar Labs www.sugarlabs.org _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
