On 07/04/2009 12:40 AM, Frederick Grose wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Frederick Grose<fgr...@sugarlabs.org>wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Simon Schampijer<si...@schampijer.de>wrote: >> >>> Hi Fred, >>> >>> it might makes sense to trim down our long wiki names. As we heavily use >>> categories now - this might not be an issue. How about we do: >>> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84 -> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Roadmap >>> >>> and >>> >>> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Releases/Sucrose/0.84-> >>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.84/Notes >>> >>> same for 0.82 and 0.86. >>> >>> What do you think? Can you do this without breaking current links? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Simon >> >> That should be possible and fits with the idea that DFarning reported of >> broadening the involvement in the platform development. >> >> I'll start with 0.82, http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.82, and leave wiki >> redirects to catch those linking from off-site links in blogs and other >> references. >> >> --Fred >> > > I've moved the Development Team/Releases branch to branches beginning with > 0.82, 0.84, 0.86,& 0.88 (the stable branches). See now that > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team#Platform_Release_Cycles and > #/Subpages are a bit more readable. > > I seem to have lost > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release/Roadmap/0.84 (notice > that it redirects to 0.86/Roadmap). Perhaps it was never saved, but only > transformed into the 0.86 roadmap. > > --Fred
Hmmm, I think I have saved it :/ The history of the file does not show any sign of being overwritten. I guess we lost it. The rest - does work all fine. Thanks, Simon _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel