On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 01:29:56PM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Gary C Martin<g...@garycmartin.com> wrote: > > On 2 Jul 2009, at 14:47, Eben Eliason wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Aleksey Lim<alsr...@member.fsf.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> But in that case we should provide possibility to mark objects that can > >>> be shared(I guess sharing all local objects by default is not a nice > >>> idea). > >> > >> Right. This would be essential. There's definitely some thought that > >> needs to be done here. > >> > >> Scott had an interesting proposal which basically exposed the Journal > >> (or some subset of it) as an RSS feed. This was really neat, because > >> it meant we could build a UI for someone else's Journal in Sugar, > >> populating it with that data, but also that these feeds could be > >> shared globally, for anyone with an RSS reader to benefit from. That's > >> a really powerful approach in my mind, and there is some starter code > >> lying around as a proof of concept already! > > > > > > +1 to rss feed concept, makes life a lot easier in a heterogeneous > > environment. > > > > I'm still catching up on email so apologies if this has been mentioned > > already. But the UI for marking of entries as sharable does not necessarily > > need to be another Journal user-interface addition** In the simplest > > approach you could just extend the Activity "Share with: my Neighbourhood" > > control to mark a Journal entry as part of the RRS feed. Would need some > > The problem I see with this is that we're talking about two different > kinds of sharing. Just because I want to make a picture I drew > available for anyone to look at, or even make a "photocopy" of to > scribble on, doesn't mean that I want to let them into a shared > painting session so they can scribble on the original with me. > > This is the difference between sharing an activity with someone > collaboratively, and sending them (a copy of) the resulting object. > > > thought on wording, do you add more levels of sharing? Or do you just > > simplify the "Share with:" language language to "Private", "Share with: > > Anyone". > > > > **though I would like entries to visually show their sharing state, the > > buddy column hints at this but should be made explicit > > I do actually think that the Journal is the best place to expose this, > especially since the way we plan to expose the feature in the UI is > something like "view <my friend>'s Journal." I'm not sure exactly how > or where that happens. Perhaps if we can abandon the checkbox for the > multi-selection we can use that space for a public/private toggle of > some kind.
so, you think that my idea of Pins looks ugly :) http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/2009-July/016025.html -- Aleksey _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel