There might be a few more people in some of the files I've seen after making that list. I'll try to send a complete list asap.
On Thursday, 20 June 2013, Walter Bender wrote: > It is a relatively short list: > > Walter Bender (wal...@sugarlabs.org <javascript:;>) I approve > Dan Williams d...@redhat.org <javascript:;> > Gary Martin garycmar...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > Christian Marc Schmidt anyth...@christianmarcschmidt.com <javascript:;> > Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > Manuel Quinones ma...@laptop.org <javascript:;> > Eben Eliason eben.elia...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org <javascript:;> > Benjamin Berg ben...@sugarlabs.org <javascript:;> > > Did I miss anyone? > > regards. > > -walter > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Tony Sebro > <t...@sfconservancy.org<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > On 06/18/2013 12:19 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn wrote: > >> > >> Meanwhile, Conservancy can help draft an email for permission to assent. > >> I'll coordinate with Tony on it and get back to you as soon as we can. > > > > Hi, all: > > Here's some draft language we can use to collect the consent of various > > copyright holders to the relicensing of code under the Apache license. > > > > If you give Conservancy a clear git log of people to contact, we can do > the > > work of collecting and recording the responses of contributors. > > > > Best, > > -Tony > > > > ---- > > Hello; > > > > You're receiving this email because you are a contributor of code and/or > > other copyrighted content to the Sugar Labs project. Software Freedom > > Conservancy is the nonprofit corporate home of Sugar Labs, and we thank > you > > for your contribution. > > > > We're writing you ask that you grant Conservancy and Sugar Labs > permission > > to relicense the code and associated files stored in the > > https://github.com/sugarlabs/sugar-artwork repository (currently > licensed > > under LGPL v2 or later) under the Apache License 2.0 as a second license. > > The result would be that everything in that repository would be available > > for use under both the LGPL2+ and the Apache License 2.0 concurrently. > > > > By adding the Apache License as a second license, Sugar Labs would be > able > > to reuse code from /sugar-artwork in javascript libraries under the > Apache > > license, and include javascript libraries licensed under the Apache > License > > inside Sugar Labs application bundles [note: feel free to suggest a > > stronger/more clearly-articulated rationale as a replacement. -Tony] > > > > Please indicate your permission by replying to this email with the > > following: > > - the words "I approve." > > - your full name > > > > We'll keep your email as record of your consent. > > > > Thanks again for your contribution and your continued support of the > Sugar > > Labs project. > > > > -- > > Tony Sebro, General Counsel, Software Freedom Conservancy > > +1-212-461-3245 x11 > > t...@sfconservancy.org <javascript:;> > > www.sfconservancy.org > > > > > > -- > Walter Bender > Sugar Labs > http://www.sugarlabs.org > -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel