This is an old change.. since Sugar 0.96 we make the changes of service_name by bundle_idand the class by exec sugar-activity.. If we change this again.. in wich sugar will be avaliable? Sugar 102? Personally, I update all my GTK-2 activities with bundle_id and exec some time ago. I offer me to make the patchs for the activities that have that problem.. Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:24:15 -0200 Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again From: gonz...@laptop.org To: alan...@hotmail.com CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
Alan,We don't maintain 700 and not all work.Breaking compatibility without a good reason is not good for any platform. Gonzalo On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: That is Ceibal problem.. not our problem..We mantain more than 700 activities and all works.. if Ceibal want, their can fix very easy this "problem"(only change 1 line in the activity.info !!! ) Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:31 -0200 Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again From: gonz...@laptop.org To: alan...@hotmail.com CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org All the Cazaproblemas, all the things done by Ceibal (like the Biblioteca) at least. Gonzalo On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: >But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in aslo. Wich activities are not in aslo?? Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:02:25 -0200 Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again From: gonz...@laptop.org To: alan...@hotmail.com CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed? I have a list, but need do it again, because the process I used to get the last version from aslo is wrong. But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in aslo. Gonzalo Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200 From: gonz...@laptop.org To: ma...@laptop.org CC: dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then. Your patch is in the correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name, which I don't think is correct. The fix should allow only GTK2 activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message, as you did. I don't see your point. Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 or gtk3activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic, only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id? We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new activities. Gonzalo Thanks, -- .. manuq .. _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
