2013/10/30 Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> > Alan, > We don't maintain 700 and not all work. > Breaking compatibility without a good reason is not good for any platform. >
+1 Ceibal can apply the patch in UY images, but this isn't the point. If an Activity work in some image and the same activity does not work in the new one, which image will choose the children? Breaking compatibility without a good reason doesn't help to use the latest version of os. Cheers, Esteban. > > > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < > alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> That is Ceibal problem.. not our problem.. >> We mantain more than 700 activities and all works.. if Ceibal want, their >> can fix very easy this "problem" >> (only change 1 line in the activity.info !!! ) >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:31 -0200 >> >> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again >> From: gonz...@laptop.org >> To: alan...@hotmail.com >> CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; >> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> >> All the Cazaproblemas, all the things done by Ceibal (like the >> Biblioteca) at least. >> >> Gonzalo >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < >> alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in >> aslo. >> >> Wich activities are not in aslo?? >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:02:25 -0200 >> >> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again >> From: gonz...@laptop.org >> To: alan...@hotmail.com >> CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; >> sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> >> >> Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed? >> >> I have a list, but need do it again, because the process I used to >> get the last version from aslo is wrong. >> >> But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in >> aslo. >> >> Gonzalo >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200 >> From: gonz...@laptop.org >> To: ma...@laptop.org >> CC: dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again >> >> >> >> Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then. Your patch is in the >> correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name, >> which I don't think is correct. The fix should allow only GTK2 >> activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message, >> as you did. >> >> >> I don't see your point. >> >> Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 >> or gtk3 >> activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic, >> only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id? >> >> We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new >> activities. >> >> Gonzalo >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> .. manuq .. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list >> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
