On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < alan...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> This is an old change.. since Sugar 0.96 we make the changes of > service_name by bundle_id > and the class by exec sugar-activity.. > Yes, and also we replaced the old toobars by the new toolbars, but activities with the old toolbars continue working. > If we change this again.. in wich sugar will be avaliable? Sugar 102? > I want include it in Sugar 0.100 > Personally, I update all my GTK-2 activities with bundle_id and exec some > time ago. > > I offer me to make the patchs for the activities that have that problem.. > > Ok, but this is bigger than you and me. We need think in the users, and make life easier to the deployments. I really don't understand what is the problem. Gonzalo > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:24:15 -0200 > > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again > From: gonz...@laptop.org > To: alan...@hotmail.com > CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > Alan, > We don't maintain 700 and not all work. > Breaking compatibility without a good reason is not good for any platform. > > Gonzalo > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < > alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > That is Ceibal problem.. not our problem.. > We mantain more than 700 activities and all works.. if Ceibal want, their > can fix very easy this "problem" > (only change 1 line in the activity.info !!! ) > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:12:31 -0200 > > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again > From: gonz...@laptop.org > To: alan...@hotmail.com > CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > All the Cazaproblemas, all the things done by Ceibal (like the Biblioteca) > at least. > > Gonzalo > > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn < > alan...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > >But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in > aslo. > > Wich activities are not in aslo?? > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 16:02:25 -0200 > > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again > From: gonz...@laptop.org > To: alan...@hotmail.com > CC: ma...@laptop.org; dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > > > Gonzalo: you have the list of activities that need be fixed? > > I have a list, but need do it again, because the process I used to > get the last version from aslo is wrong. > > But anyway we have the problem of all the activities not available in aslo. > > Gonzalo > > > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:41:56 -0200 > From: gonz...@laptop.org > To: ma...@laptop.org > CC: dwnarv...@gmail.com; sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] service_name and bundle_id... again > > > > Oh, good Gonzalo, this is the bug to solve then. Your patch is in the > correct direction, but allows GTK3 activities to use service_name, > which I don't think is correct. The fix should allow only GTK2 > activities to use service_name, and log a deprecation warning message, > as you did. > > > I don't see your point. > > Look at the code. activitybundle.py do not have logic to recognize gtk2 or > gtk3 > activities. The patch is simple, why look for a more complicate logic, > only to avoid new activities using service_name instead of bundle_id? > > We have a problem with old activities stopping working, not with new > activities. > > Gonzalo > > > > Thanks, > > -- > .. manuq .. > > > > _______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel