On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Devin Ulibarri <devin@ulibarri.website> wrote:
> On 05/27/2016 08:55 AM, Dave Crossland wrote: > > I think its pretty clear that Github's business model _depends_ on it > > hosting the world's libre licensed code: That's how they get developers > > into their conversion funnel. > > Notice from the ethics article that one big deal with GitHub is it > allows developers to upload code without a license (thus being > proprietary by default, even though we can all see the code). > > As a start, I think we should push on GitHub to discourage this practice. > This has been the topic of a lot of discussion on the FOSS foundation list of late. I think there is a movement afoot to push them towards a default FOSS license. -walter > > Devin > _______________________________________________ > Sugar-devel mailing list > Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
