Hi On 27 May 2016 at 08:59, Devin Ulibarri <devin@ulibarri.website> wrote:
> Notice from the ethics article that one big deal with GitHub is it > allows developers to upload code without a license (thus being > proprietary by default, even though we can all see the code). > I don't think a default libre license would be wise; for a start, which one? I've seen PLENTY of projects intend to be licensed as X but accidentally adding license Y to the repo and then just updating the file, so the old license is there in the git history. As a start, I think we should push on GitHub to discourage this practice. > Licensing is serious stuff and I think its self-defeating for the movement to make people less conscious of it by offering easy defaults :) -- Cheers Dave
_______________________________________________ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
